Historique
Article de Périodique
Clinical measurement of addictions (2012)
Auteur(s) :
R. CLOUTIER ;
A. LESAGE ;
M. LANDRY ;
S. KAIROUZ ;
J. M. MENARD
Article en page(s) :
33-39
Sous-type de document :
Revue de la littérature / Literature review
Refs biblio. :
18
Domaine :
Plusieurs produits / Several products
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Discipline :
PRO (Produits, mode d'action, méthode de dépistage / Substances, action mode, screening methods)
Thésaurus mots-clés
DIAGNOSTIC
;
ADDICTION
;
QUESTIONNAIRE
;
TEST
;
COGNITION
;
VALIDITE
;
DEPENDANCE
Résumé :
Introduction and Aims. To conduct a systematic review of instruments for the clinical measurement of addictive behaviours and to determine whether substance addictive behaviours (SAB) and non-substance addictive behaviours (NSAB) are similarly conceptualised in clinical research.
Design and Methods. The analytic strategy employed comprised three steps: (i) major search engines were used to take stock of available clinical instruments for assessing addictive behaviours; (ii) an analysis grid was developed and validated, covering 21 parameters under four heuristic categories: dependence, temperament, social handicap and cognitive behaviour; and (iii) all instruments were analysed and compared via the grid.
Results. The search yielded 157 questionnaires covering 14 addictive behaviours. The analysis grid allowed rating all questionnaire items on one parameter only; very good interrater agreement was maintained throughout. The categories most evaluated by the questionnaires were dependence and cognitive behaviour; temperament and social handicap were much less frequently considered. Patterns were generally similar in terms of categories, whether questionnaires concerned SAB or NSAB; however, differences within categories indicated a greater frequency of psychologically oriented parameters for NSAB.
Conclusions. The measurement of addictive behaviours appears clinically cohesive, as determined by a validated analysis grid applied to an exhaustive set of questionnaires identified through a systematic literature review.
Design and Methods. The analytic strategy employed comprised three steps: (i) major search engines were used to take stock of available clinical instruments for assessing addictive behaviours; (ii) an analysis grid was developed and validated, covering 21 parameters under four heuristic categories: dependence, temperament, social handicap and cognitive behaviour; and (iii) all instruments were analysed and compared via the grid.
Results. The search yielded 157 questionnaires covering 14 addictive behaviours. The analysis grid allowed rating all questionnaire items on one parameter only; very good interrater agreement was maintained throughout. The categories most evaluated by the questionnaires were dependence and cognitive behaviour; temperament and social handicap were much less frequently considered. Patterns were generally similar in terms of categories, whether questionnaires concerned SAB or NSAB; however, differences within categories indicated a greater frequency of psychologically oriented parameters for NSAB.
Conclusions. The measurement of addictive behaviours appears clinically cohesive, as determined by a validated analysis grid applied to an exhaustive set of questionnaires identified through a systematic literature review.
Affiliation :
Université de Montréal, Canada