|Titre :||Cost-effectiveness of postexposure prophylaxis after sexual or injection-drug exposure to human immunodeficiency virus|
|Titre traduit :||(Coût-efficacité de la prophylaxie post-exposition après une exposition par voie sexuelle ou par injection au virus de l'immunodéficience humaine)|
|Auteurs :||S. D. PINKERTON ; J. N. MARTIN ; ROLAND M. E. ; M. H. KATZ ; COATES T. J. ; J. O. KAHN|
|Type de document :||Périodique|
|Année de publication :||2004|
|Note générale :||
Archives of Internal Medicine, 2004, 164, (1), 46-54
|Discipline :||MAL (Maladies infectieuses / Infectious diseases)|
Thésaurus TOXIBASEVIH ; INJECTION ; INFECTION ; COUT ; EFFICACITE ; SEXUALITE ; ETUDE RETROSPECTIVE ; EVALUATION
BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of interventions that provide human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to individuals after sexual or injection-drug use exposures depends on the distribution of exposure routes, prevalence of infection among source partners, adherence to PEP regimens, medical care costs, and prevailing epidemiologic contexts, among other factors. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive program to prevent HIV infection after sexual or injection-drug use exposure for 401 persons seeking PEP in an urban community. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cost analysis to evaluate the cost of the PEP intervention, then combined this information with model-based effectiveness estimates to determine the PEP program's "cost-utility ratio," which is the ratio of net program costs to the total number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) saved by the program. RESULTS: The average cost of the PEP regimen was $1222, and the total cost of the program was $450 970. The PEP program prevented an estimated 1.26 HIV infections, saved 11.74 QALYs, and averted $281 323 in future HIV-related medical care costs. The overall cost-utility ratio was $14 449 per QALY saved. When analysis was restricted to men reporting receptive anal intercourse, the savings in averted HIV-related medical care costs exceeded the cost of the program. The results were generally robust to changes in key parameter values but were sensitive to assumptions about the HIV transmission probability for receptive anal intercourse. CONCLUSIONS: For this study population, HIV PEP was cost-effective by conventional standards and cost-saving for persons seeking PEP after male-male receptive anal intercourse.
|Domaine :||Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs|
|Refs biblio. :||55|
Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53202
Etats-Unis. United States.
|Numéro Toxibase :||1301619|
|Centre Emetteur :||13 OFDT|