Titre : | The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review |
Titre traduit : | (L'utilisation d'interventions brèves adaptées de la méthode de l'interview de motivation dans le champ des comportements : une revue systématique.) |
Auteurs : | C. DUNN ; L. DEROO ; F. P. RIVARA |
Type de document : | Périodique |
Année de publication : | 2001 |
Format : | 1725-1742 |
Note générale : | Addiction, 2001, 96, (12), 1725-1742 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Discipline : | TRA (Traitement et prise en charge / Treatment and care) |
Mots-clés : |
Thésaurus mots-clés TRAITEMENT ; ENTRETIEN MOTIVATIONNEL ; MOTIVATION ; COMPORTEMENT ; TEST ; METHODE ; EFFICACITE ; INTERVENTION BREVE ; ENTRETIEN |
Résumé : |
FRANÇAIS :
Quatre champs de comportements sont étudiés : l'abus de drogues, le tabagisme, la réduction des risques VIH et la perte de poids, à l'aide du MI (Motivational Interviewing), outil de conseil pour un changement de comportement. Une revue de 29 essais d'intervention fondée sur le MI montre que cette méthode est efficace dans le champ de l'abus de drogues quand elle est mise en oeuvre par des cliniciens non spécialistes du traitement de l'abus de drogues, notamment pour renforcer l'engagement dans des modalités de traitement spécifiques. Mais les données ne sont pas adaptées pour juger de l'efficacité du MI dans les autres domaines. ENGLISH: Aims. To examine the effectiveness of brief behavioral interventions adapting the principles and techniques of Motivational Interviewing (MI) to four behavioral domains: substance abuse, smoking, HIV risk and diet/exercise. Design. We conducted a systematic review of 29 randomized trials of MI interventions. Data on methodological quality were extracted and tabulated Between-group behavior change effect sizes and confidence intervals were calculated for each study. Findings. Due to varying intervention time lengths, targeted problem behaviors, settings and interventionists' backgrounds and skill levels, outcomes were not combined meta-analytically. Sixty per cent of the 29 studies yielded at least one significant behavior change effect size. No significant association between length of follow-up time and magnitude of effect sizes was found across studies. There was substantial evidence that MI is an effective substance abuse intervention method when used by clinicians who are non-specialists in substance abuse treatment, particularly when enhancing entry to and engagement in more intensive substance abuse treatment treatment-as-usual. Data were inadequate to judge the effect of MI in the other domains. Client attribute-treatment interactions were understudied and the sparse and inconsistent findings revealed little about the mechanism by which MI works or for whom it works best. Conclusion. To determine more effectively how well MI works in domains other than substance abuse and for whom it works best in all domains, researchers should study MI with risk behaviors other than substance abuse, while examining both interactions and the theoretical components of MI. |
Domaine : | Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs ; Tabac / Tobacco / e-cigarette |
Sous-type de document : | Revue de la littérature / Literature review |
Affiliation : | Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, USA |
Numéro Toxibase : | 205860 |
Centre Emetteur : | 02 Coordonnateur |
Cote : | Abonnement |
Exemplaires
Disponibilité |
---|
aucun exemplaire |
Accueil