|Titre :||Conspicuous by their abstinence: The limited engagement of heroin users in English and Welsh Drug Recovery Wings (2016)|
|Auteurs :||G. PAGE ; L. TEMPLETON ; S. GRACE ; P. ROBERTS ; N. McKEGANEY ; C. RUSSELL ; A. LIEBLING ; Z. KOUGIALI ; C. LLOYD|
|Type de document :||Article : Périodique|
|Dans :||International Journal of Drug Policy (Vol.29, March 2016)|
|Article en page(s) :||49-56|
|Discipline :||TRA (Traitement et prise en charge / Treatment and care)|
Thésaurus TOXIBASEPRISON ; HEROINE ; ABSTINENCE ; GUERISON ; TRAITEMENT DE MAINTENANCE ; USAGER ; SUBSTITUTION ; EVALUATION
Background: In recent years, an abstinence-focused, 'recovery' agenda has emerged in UK drug policy, largely in response to the perception that many opioid users had been 'parked indefinitely' on opioid substitution therapy (OST). The introduction of ten pilot 'Drug Recovery Wings' (DRWs) in 2011 represents the application of this recovery agenda to prisons. This paper describes the DRWs' operational models, the place of opiate dependent prisoners within them, and the challenges of delivering 'recovery' in prison.
Methods: In 2013, the implementation and operational models of all ten pilot DRWs were rapidly assessed. Up to three days were spent in each DRW, undertaking semi-structured interviews with a sample of 94 DRW staff and 102 DRW residents. Interviews were fully transcribed, and coded using grounded theory. Findings from the nine adult prisons are presented here.
Results: Four types of DRW were identified, distinguished by their size and selection criteria. Strikingly, no mid- or large-sized units regularly supported OST recipients through detoxification. Type A were large units whose residents were mostly on OST with long criminal records and few social or personal resources. Detoxification was rare, and medication reduction slow. Type B's mid-sized DRW was developed as a psychosocial support service for OST clients seeking detoxification. However, staff struggled to find such prisoners, and detoxification again proved rare. Type C DRWs focused on abstinence from all drugs, including OST. Though OST clients were not intentionally excluded, very few applied to these wings. Only Type D DRWs, offering intensive treatment on very small wings, regularly recruited OST recipients into abstinence-focused interventions.
Conclusion: Prison units wishing to support OST recipients in making greater progress towards abstinence may need to be small, intensive and take a stepped approach based on preparatory motivational work and extensive preparation for release. However, concerns about post-release deaths will remain.
|Domaine :||Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs|
|Affiliation :||Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK|