Historique
Article de Périodique
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: A systematic review (2012)
Auteur(s) :
WILSON, L. M. ;
AVILA TANG, E. ;
CHANDER, G. ;
HUTTON, H. E. ;
ODELOLA, O. A. ;
ELF, J. L. ;
HECKMAN-STODDARD, B. M. ;
BASS, E. B. ;
LITTLE, E. A. ;
HABERL, E. B. ;
APELBERG, B. J.
Année :
2012
Page(s) :
Article ID 961724 ; 36 p.
Sous-type de document :
Revue de la littérature / Literature review
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
154
Domaine :
Tabac / Tobacco / e-cigarette
Discipline :
SAN (Santé publique / Public health)
Thésaurus mots-clés
ARRET DU TABAC
;
TABAC
;
INTERVENTION
;
INITIATION
;
ABSTINENCE
;
PREVALENCE
;
POLITIQUE
;
PRIX
;
INTERDICTION DE FUMER
;
TAXE
;
PUBLICITE
;
AVERTISSEMENT SANITAIRE
;
EFFICACITE
Résumé :
Background. Policymakers need estimates of the impact of tobacco control (TC) policies to set priorities and targets for reducing tobacco use. We systematically reviewed the independent effects of TC policies on smoking behavior.
Methods. We searched MEDLINE (through January 2012) and EMBASE and other databases through February 2009, looking for studies published after 1989 in any language that assessed the effects of each TC intervention on smoking prevalence, initiation, cessation, or price participation elasticity. Paired reviewers extracted data from studies that isolated the impact of a single TC intervention.
Findings. We included 84 studies. The strength of evidence quantifying the independent effect on smoking prevalence was high for increasing tobacco prices and moderate for smoking bans in public places and antitobacco mass media campaigns. Limited direct evidence was available to quantify the effects of health warning labels and bans on advertising and sponsorship. Studies were too heterogeneous to pool effect estimates.
Interpretations. We found evidence of an independent effect for several TC policies on smoking prevalence. However, we could not derive precise estimates of the effects across different settings because of variability in the characteristics of the intervention, level of policy enforcement, and underlying tobacco control environment. (copyright) 2012 Lisa M. Wilson et al.
Methods. We searched MEDLINE (through January 2012) and EMBASE and other databases through February 2009, looking for studies published after 1989 in any language that assessed the effects of each TC intervention on smoking prevalence, initiation, cessation, or price participation elasticity. Paired reviewers extracted data from studies that isolated the impact of a single TC intervention.
Findings. We included 84 studies. The strength of evidence quantifying the independent effect on smoking prevalence was high for increasing tobacco prices and moderate for smoking bans in public places and antitobacco mass media campaigns. Limited direct evidence was available to quantify the effects of health warning labels and bans on advertising and sponsorship. Studies were too heterogeneous to pool effect estimates.
Interpretations. We found evidence of an independent effect for several TC policies on smoking prevalence. However, we could not derive precise estimates of the effects across different settings because of variability in the characteristics of the intervention, level of policy enforcement, and underlying tobacco control environment. (copyright) 2012 Lisa M. Wilson et al.
Affiliation :
Wilson, L.M., Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA