Article de Périodique
Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use (2011)
Auteur(s) :
COUSIJN, J. ;
GOUDRIAAN, A. E. ;
WIERS, R. W.
Année :
2011
Page(s) :
1667-1674
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
54
Domaine :
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Discipline :
PSY (Psychopathologie / Psychopathology)
Thésaurus mots-clés
CANNABIS
;
ETUDE TRANSVERSALE
;
QUESTIONNAIRE
;
COMPULSION
;
USAGE PROBLEMATIQUE
;
TEST
;
DIAGNOSTIC
;
SUIVI DU PATIENT
Thésaurus géographique
PAYS-BAS
Autres mots-clés
Résumé :
AIMS: Repeated drug exposure can lead to an approach-bias, i.e. the relatively automatically triggered tendencies to approach rather that avoid drug-related stimuli. Our main aim was to study this approach-bias in heavy cannabis users with the newly developed cannabis Approach Avoidance Task (cannabis-AAT) and to investigate the predictive relationship between an approach-bias for cannabis-related materials and levels of cannabis use, craving, and the course of cannabis use.
DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional assessment and six-month follow-up in 32 heavy cannabis users and 39 non-using controls.
MEASUREMENTS: Approach and avoidance action-tendencies towards cannabis and neutral images were assessed with the cannabis AAT. During the AAT, participants pulled or pushed a joystick in response to image orientation. To generate additional sense of approach or avoidance, pulling the joystick increased picture size while pushing decreased it. Craving was measured pre- and post-test with the multi-factorial Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ). Cannabis use frequencies and levels of dependence were measured at baseline and after a six-month follow-up.
FINDINGS: Heavy cannabis users demonstrated an approach-bias for cannabis images, as compared to controls. The approach-bias predicted changes in cannabis use at six-month follow-up. The pre-test MCQ emotionality and expectancy factor were associated negatively with the approach-bias. No effects were found on levels of cannabis dependence.
CONCLUSIONS: Heavy cannabis users with a strong approach-bias for cannabis are more likely to increase their cannabis use. This approach-bias could be used as a predictor of the course of cannabis use to identify individuals at risk from increasing cannabis use.
DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional assessment and six-month follow-up in 32 heavy cannabis users and 39 non-using controls.
MEASUREMENTS: Approach and avoidance action-tendencies towards cannabis and neutral images were assessed with the cannabis AAT. During the AAT, participants pulled or pushed a joystick in response to image orientation. To generate additional sense of approach or avoidance, pulling the joystick increased picture size while pushing decreased it. Craving was measured pre- and post-test with the multi-factorial Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ). Cannabis use frequencies and levels of dependence were measured at baseline and after a six-month follow-up.
FINDINGS: Heavy cannabis users demonstrated an approach-bias for cannabis images, as compared to controls. The approach-bias predicted changes in cannabis use at six-month follow-up. The pre-test MCQ emotionality and expectancy factor were associated negatively with the approach-bias. No effects were found on levels of cannabis dependence.
CONCLUSIONS: Heavy cannabis users with a strong approach-bias for cannabis are more likely to increase their cannabis use. This approach-bias could be used as a predictor of the course of cannabis use to identify individuals at risk from increasing cannabis use.
Affiliation :
ADAPT-lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands