|Titre :||Comparative impact of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in three European countries (2012)|
|Auteurs :||G. E. NAGELHOUT ; H. DE VRIES ; C. BOUDREAU ; S. ALLWRIGHT ; A. McNEILL ; B. VAN DEN PUTTE ; G. T. FONG ; M. C. WILLEMSEN|
|Type de document :||Article : Périodique|
|Dans :||European Journal of Public Health (Vol.22, Suppl.1, February 2012)|
|Article en page(s) :||4-9|
|Discipline :||LOI (Loi et son application / Law enforcement)|
Thésaurus mots-clésARRET DU TABAC ; LEGISLATION ; TABAC ; INTERDICTION DE FUMER ; COMPARAISON ; ETUDE LONGITUDINALE ; ABSTINENCE ; MILIEU PROFESSIONNEL
Thésaurus géographiqueEUROPE ; ROYAUME-UNI ; PAYS-BAS ; IRLANDE ; ANGLETERRE
Background: Little is known about the differential impact of comprehensive and partial smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation. This study aimed to examine the impact of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in Ireland and England, and partial hospitality industry legislation in the Netherlands on quit attempts and quit success.
Methods: Nationally representative samples of 2,219 adult smokers were interviewed in three countries as part of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys. Quit attempts and quit success were compared between period 1 (in which smoke-free legislation was implemented in Ireland and the Netherlands) and period 2 (in which smoke-free legislation was implemented in England).
Results: In Ireland, significantly more smokers attempted to quit smoking in period 1 (50.5%) than in period 2 (36.4%) (p Conclusion: The comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Ireland and England may have had positive effects on quit attempts and quit success respectively. The partial smoke-free legislation in the Netherlands probably had no effect on quit attempts or quit success. Therefore, it is recommended that countries implement comprehensive smoke-free legislation.
|Domaine :||Tabac / Tobacco|
|Refs biblio. :||32|
|Affiliation :||Maastricht University, CAPHRI, The Netherlands|