Titre : | Reply to comments on 'behavioural (non-chemical) addictions'. Commentary (1990) |
Auteurs : | I. MARKS |
Type de document : | Article : Périodique |
Dans : | British Journal of Addiction (Vol.85, n°11, November 1990) |
Article en page(s) : | 1429-1431 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Discipline : | SHS (Sciences humaines et sociales / Humanities and social sciences) |
Mots-clés : |
Thésaurus mots-clés ADDICTION ; CONCEPT ; COMPORTEMENT |
Résumé : | Behavioural addictions involve routines of dysfunctional and purposeful behaviour. Taxonomy is a program for action and coloured by values. This is obvious in 'panic disorder' and may affect the classification of addictions. Biologically minded psychiatrists may attach less weight than do behavioural scientists to overarching similarities across chemical and nonchemical addictive syndromes. There is no foolproof guide to classification, be it response to therapy, aetiology, maintaining mechanism, or phenomenology. Communalities across behavioural and chemical addictions do not exclude potentially important differences among them. Both pharmacological and behavioural interventions may be useful in different cases. Control over an addictive routine is reduced rather than lost and may rise with treatment. Broadening one's repertoire of activities may be preventive and therapeutic. Motivation to change is a multifactorial state that may vary with time and be augmented by therapy; lay organisations can have useful lessons for clinicians. Relevant political influences can be crucial and hard to modify. |
Domaine : | Addictions sans produit / Addictions without drug |
Affiliation : | Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SES 8AF, Royaume-Uni |
Accueil