|Titre :||Continuities and changes in self-change research [For debate] (2010)|
|Auteurs :||H. KLINGEMANN ; M. B. SOBELL ; L. C. SOBELL|
|Type de document :||Article : Périodique|
|Dans :||Addiction (Vol.105, n°9, September 2010)|
|Article en page(s) :||1510-1518 + 1519-1524 (commentaries)|
|Note générale :||Commentaries: HAO W., TAN L., TANG Q. Towards a self-change-friendly treatment and policy for addictive behaviours. SLUTSKE W.S. Why is natural recovery so common for addictive disorders? MILLER P.M., SMITH J.P. What do marshmallows and golf tell us about natural recovery research TEESSON M. What does self-change mean for how we deliver treatment? Discussion p. 1524.|
|Discipline :||TRA (Traitement et prise en charge / Treatment and care)|
Thésaurus TOXIBASEPROCESSUS DE MATURATION ; CONCEPT ; GUERISON ; RECHERCHE ; CULTUREL ; TRAITEMENT
AIMS: A substantial literature demonstrates that natural recoveries from substance use disorders not only occur but are a common pathway to recovery. This article reviews selectively and comments on the current state-of-the-art in natural recovery research.
METHODS: Basic concepts in natural recovery research are presented, and topical and methodological trends and changes in self-change research over time are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: Although considerable progress has occurred in natural recovery research, several topics deserving of further research are identified, and implications for policy practice are discussed. [Author's abstract]
|Domaine :||Plusieurs produits / Several products|
|Refs biblio. :||78|
|Affiliation :||University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland|