Article de Périodique
Differences in client and therapist views of the working alliance in drug treatment (2006)
(Différences dans les points de vue du patient et du thérapeute sur la collaboration dans la prise en charge de la drogue)
Auteur(s) :
P. S. MEIER ;
M. C. DONMALL
Article en page(s) :
73-80
Refs biblio. :
18
Domaine :
Plusieurs produits / Several products
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Note générale :
Journal of Substance Use, 2006, 11, (1), 73-80
Note de contenu :
tabl.
Résumé :
ENGLISH :
Background: There is growing evidence that the therapeutic alliance is one of the most consistent predictors of retention and outcomes in drug treatment. Recent psychotherapy research has indicated that there is a lack of agreement between client, therapist and observer ratings of the therapeutic alliance; however, the clinical implications of this lack of consensus have not been explored. Aims: The aims of the study are to (1) explore the extent to which, in drug treatment, clients and counsellors agree in their perceptions of their alliance, and (2) investigate whether the degree of disagreement between clients and counsellors is related to retention in treatment. Methods: The study recruited 187 clients starting residential rehabilitation treatment for drug misuse in three UK services. Client and counsellor ratings of the therapeutic alliance (using the WAI-S) were obtained during weeks 112. Retention was in this study defined as remaining in treatment for at least 12 weeks. Results: Client and counsellor ratings of the alliance were only weakly related (correlations ranging from r = 0.07 to 0.42) and tended to become more dissimilar over the first 12 weeks in treatment. However, whether or not clients and counsellors agreed on the quality of their relationship did not influence whether clients were retained in treatment. Conclusions: The low consensus between client and counsellor views of the alliance found in this and other studies highlights the need for drug counsellors to attend closely to their clients' perceptions of the alliance and to seek regular feedback from clients regarding their feelings about their therapeutic relationship (Author' s abstract)
ENGLISH :
Background: There is growing evidence that the therapeutic alliance is one of the most consistent predictors of retention and outcomes in drug treatment. Recent psychotherapy research has indicated that there is a lack of agreement between client, therapist and observer ratings of the therapeutic alliance; however, the clinical implications of this lack of consensus have not been explored. Aims: The aims of the study are to (1) explore the extent to which, in drug treatment, clients and counsellors agree in their perceptions of their alliance, and (2) investigate whether the degree of disagreement between clients and counsellors is related to retention in treatment. Methods: The study recruited 187 clients starting residential rehabilitation treatment for drug misuse in three UK services. Client and counsellor ratings of the therapeutic alliance (using the WAI-S) were obtained during weeks 112. Retention was in this study defined as remaining in treatment for at least 12 weeks. Results: Client and counsellor ratings of the alliance were only weakly related (correlations ranging from r = 0.07 to 0.42) and tended to become more dissimilar over the first 12 weeks in treatment. However, whether or not clients and counsellors agreed on the quality of their relationship did not influence whether clients were retained in treatment. Conclusions: The low consensus between client and counsellor views of the alliance found in this and other studies highlights the need for drug counsellors to attend closely to their clients' perceptions of the alliance and to seek regular feedback from clients regarding their feelings about their therapeutic relationship (Author' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Department of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK 2: National Drug Evidence Centre, University of Manchester, UK ||
Royaume-Uni. United Kingdom.
Royaume-Uni. United Kingdom.