Historique
Périodique
A postmarketing study of relative abuse liability of hypnotic sedative drugs
(Une étude postmarketing du potentiel de dépendance de médicaments hypnotiques et sédatifs.)
Auteur(s) :
J. H. JAFFE ;
R. BLOOR ;
I. CROME ;
M. CARR ;
F. ALAM ;
SIMMONS A. ;
R. E. MEYER
Article en page(s) :
165-173
Refs biblio. :
25
Domaine :
Autres substances / Other substances
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Discipline :
PRO (Produits, mode d'action, méthode de dépistage / Substances, action mode, screening methods)
Thésaurus mots-clés
BENZODIAZEPINES
;
ANTIHISTAMINIQUES
;
HYPNOTIQUES
;
ANTIDEPRESSEURS
;
POTENTIEL ADDICTIF
;
QUESTIONNAIRE
Note générale :
Addiction, 2004, 99, (2), 165-173
Note de contenu :
graph. ; tabl.
Résumé :
FRANÇAIS :
L'utilité d'évaluer le potentiel d'abus de médicaments à partir d'informations recueillies par questionnaire auprès de patients est démontrée dans cette étude pilote portant sur 297 sujets qui ont répondu à 15 questions sur 5 benzodiazépines, 3 anti-dépresseurs, 2 hypnotiques non benzodiazépiniques et 2 antihistaminiques. Les 3 benzodiazépines (diazépam, nitrazipam, témazépam) ont les scores les plus élevés sur les items estimant le potentiel d'abus et les antihistaminiques ont les scores les plus bas.
ENGLISH :
Aims: To demonstrate the utility of postmarketing studies using in-treatment drug and alcohol abusers as informants for assessing the relative abuse liability of sedative-hypnotic drugs. Design: A survey was conducted that ascertained exposure to a variety of drugs with hypnotic/sedative properties and elicited subjective evaluations indicative of abuse liability. Methods: Complete data were obtained from 297 admissions (78% male) to three addiction treatment sites in the United Kingdom. Subjects were asked 15 questions about 12 different drugs, including five benzodiazepines, three antidepressants, two non-benzodiazepine hypnotics and two antihistamines (plus one fictitious drug). Three of the benzodiazepines (diazepam, nitrazipam, temazepam) emerged as having substantially more abuse liability than any of the other drugs tested, as revealed by higher scores on abuse liability items (purchased on street, taken to get high, like drug, potential for addiction to drug). The antihistamines (chlorpheniramine, diphenhydramine) had lowest abuse liability profiles, while the antidepressants (amitriptyline, fluoxetine, trazadone) and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (zolpidem, zopiclone) had similar proflles. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that postmarketing information on hypnotic drug use obtained from drug addicts entering treatment produces data consistent with other measures of abuse liability. The data suggest that the risk of misuse of newer non-benzodiazepine hypnotics may be less than that of benzodiazepine drugs, and similar to that of sedating antidepressants. The new methodology may serve to clarify or validate premarketing abuse liability data, and may help to inform the regulatory process and physician practice. (Review' s abstract)
L'utilité d'évaluer le potentiel d'abus de médicaments à partir d'informations recueillies par questionnaire auprès de patients est démontrée dans cette étude pilote portant sur 297 sujets qui ont répondu à 15 questions sur 5 benzodiazépines, 3 anti-dépresseurs, 2 hypnotiques non benzodiazépiniques et 2 antihistaminiques. Les 3 benzodiazépines (diazépam, nitrazipam, témazépam) ont les scores les plus élevés sur les items estimant le potentiel d'abus et les antihistaminiques ont les scores les plus bas.
ENGLISH :
Aims: To demonstrate the utility of postmarketing studies using in-treatment drug and alcohol abusers as informants for assessing the relative abuse liability of sedative-hypnotic drugs. Design: A survey was conducted that ascertained exposure to a variety of drugs with hypnotic/sedative properties and elicited subjective evaluations indicative of abuse liability. Methods: Complete data were obtained from 297 admissions (78% male) to three addiction treatment sites in the United Kingdom. Subjects were asked 15 questions about 12 different drugs, including five benzodiazepines, three antidepressants, two non-benzodiazepine hypnotics and two antihistamines (plus one fictitious drug). Three of the benzodiazepines (diazepam, nitrazipam, temazepam) emerged as having substantially more abuse liability than any of the other drugs tested, as revealed by higher scores on abuse liability items (purchased on street, taken to get high, like drug, potential for addiction to drug). The antihistamines (chlorpheniramine, diphenhydramine) had lowest abuse liability profiles, while the antidepressants (amitriptyline, fluoxetine, trazadone) and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (zolpidem, zopiclone) had similar proflles. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that postmarketing information on hypnotic drug use obtained from drug addicts entering treatment produces data consistent with other measures of abuse liability. The data suggest that the risk of misuse of newer non-benzodiazepine hypnotics may be less than that of benzodiazepine drugs, and similar to that of sedating antidepressants. The new methodology may serve to clarify or validate premarketing abuse liability data, and may help to inform the regulatory process and physician practice. (Review' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Univ. Maryland, dpt psychiat., Bethesda, MD.
Etats-Unis. United States.
Etats-Unis. United States.
Exemplaires
| Disponibilité |
|---|
| aucun exemplaire |