Titre :
|
The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study : main findings from two randomized trials
|
Titre traduit :
|
(L'étude concernant la prise en charge de la consommation du cannabis chez les jeunes. Principaux résultats de deux essais randomisés)
|
Auteurs :
|
M. DENNIS ;
S. H. GODLEY ;
DIAMOND G. ;
F. M. TIMS ;
T. F. BABOR ;
J. DONALDSON ;
H. LIDDLE ;
J. C. TITUS ;
Y. KAMINER ;
C. WEBB ;
N. HAMILTON ;
FUNK R.
|
Type de document :
|
Périodique
|
Année de publication :
|
2004
|
Format :
|
197-213 / graph. ; tabl.
|
Note générale :
|
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2004, 27, (3), 197-213
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Discipline :
|
TRA (Traitement et prise en charge / Treatment and care)
|
Mots-clés :
|
Thésaurus TOXIBASE
CANNABIS
;
JEUNE
;
PRISE EN CHARGE
;
EVALUATION
;
COMPARAISON
;
EFFICACITE
;
MOTIVATION
;
ENTRETIEN
;
THERAPIE COGNITIVO-COMPORTEMENTALE
;
THERAPIE FAMILIALE
;
ACTION COMMUNAUTAIRE
|
Résumé :
|
This article presents the main outcome findings from two inter-related randomized trials conducted at four sites to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of five short-term outpatient interventions for adolescents with cannabis use disorders. Trial 1 compared five sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT) with a 12-session regimen of MET and CBT (MET/CBT12) and another that included family education and therapy components (Family Support Network [FSN]). Trial II compared the five-session MET/CBT with the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (ACRA) and Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT). The 600 cannabis users were predominately white males, aged 1516. All five CYT interventions demonstrated significant pre-post treatment during the 12 months after random assignment to a treatment intervention in the two main outcomes: days of abstinence and the percent of adolescents in recovery (no use or abuse/dependence problems and living in the community). Overall, the clinical outcomes were very similar across sites and conditions; however, after controlling for initial severity, the most cost-effective interventions were MET/CBT5 and MET/CBT12 in Trial 1 and ACRA and MET/CBT5 in Trial 2. It is possible that the similar results occurred because outcomes were driven more by general factors beyond the treatment approaches tested in this study; or because of shared, general helping factors across therapies that help these teens attend to and decrease their connection to cannabis and alcohol.
|
Domaine :
|
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
|
Refs biblio. :
|
97
|
Affiliation :
|
Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL, USA
|
Numéro Toxibase :
|
404640
|
Centre Emetteur :
|
04 CIRDD-51
|