Détail de l'auteur
Auteur P. JANIK
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Categorization of psychoactive substances into "hard drugs" and "soft drugs": a critical review of terminology used in current scientific literature / P. JANIK ; M. KOSTICOVA ; J. PECENAK ; M. TURCEK in American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol.43, n°6 (December 2017)
Titre : Categorization of psychoactive substances into "hard drugs" and "soft drugs": a critical review of terminology used in current scientific literature Type de document : Périodique Auteurs : P. JANIK ; M. KOSTICOVA ; J. PECENAK ; M. TURCEK Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : 636-646 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Thésaurus TOXIBASE
CLASSIFICATION ; DEFINITION ; ALCOOL ; TABAC ; MEDICAMENTS ; PRODUIT ILLICITE ; CANNABINOIDES ; LANGAGE
Discipline : SAN Santé publique / Public health Résumé : Background: Precise terminology and definitions are important components of scientific language. Although the terms hard drugs and soft drugs are used widely by professionals, neither the International Classification of Diseases nor the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual classify psychoactive substances into the categories hard and soft.
Objectives: To analyze the occurrence of the terms hard drugs and soft drugs in recent scientific literature and to establish the degree of consensus in labeling psychoactive substances as hard or soft.Methods: A critical review of scientific papers listed in PubMed and Scopus between 2011 and 2015. Three hundred thirty-four articles were initially identified as potentially relevant for review, 132 of which were included in the final analysis.
Results: One hundred twenty-four articles used the term hard drugs and 84.7% provided examples of substances considered hard. Forty-four articles used the term soft drugs and 90.9% provided examples of substances considered soft. Citations of relevant articles supporting categorization as hard or soft were not given in 90% of the articles. The authors often provided no or only very sparse information on their reasons for considering specific drugs as hard or soft.
Conclusions: Although it initially appeared that there is substantial agreement as to which psychoactive substances should be regarded as hard and soft, closer inspection shows that the dividing line is blurred without clear criteria for categorization. At this time, it remains uncertain whether these terms should persist in the scientific literature. We therefore recommend these terms should be avoided or, if used, be clearly and precisely defined.
Domaine : Autres substances / Other substances ; Plusieurs produits / Several products Sous-type de document : Revue de la littérature / Literature review Refs biblio. : 156 Affiliation : Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia Lien : https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2017.1335736 Permalink :
in American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse > Vol.43, n°6 (December 2017) . - 636-646[article]