Exploring and describing alcohol harm reduction interventions: a scoping review of literature from the past decade in the Western world (2024)

CONTEXT: Regular alcohol use is a predominant risk factor for disease, injury, and social harm. While robust evidence is advocating for implementing interventions to reduce the harms of illegal substance use, less literature is dedicated to identifying and understanding interventions aiming at reducing the various harms associated with alcohol.
OBJECTIVES: This review describes how alcohol harm reduction (AHR) interventions are currently conducted and analyzes the facilitators and barriers identified by the studies on their efficacy.
METHOD: This scoping review with evidence appraisal included articles published between 2011 and 2022, addressing one or more AHR interventions for population of at least 18 years (including alcohol user who have an addiction but also alcohol user with harmful drinking), conducted in North industrialized countries (Europe, Nort America, Australia).
RESULTS: Among the 61 articles selected, we identified several forms of support (face-to-face or remote, support in residential settings, structural interventions, and interventions created upon spontaneous initiatives), and strategies of intervention were also analyzed (the ones based upon learning and skill development, the ones based upon psychological support, the ones focusing upon socio-economic conditions, strategies focusing on the coordination and adaptation of the care system, and those strategies based on peer support). The facilitators linked to fundamental characteristics of the interventions were the promotion of empowerment and autonomy of beneficiaries, setting objectives tailored to individual needs, professionals harmonizing their values, evidence-based interventions taking into account cultural contexts, and comprehensive and holistic support. Practical facilitators from the intervention process consist of increasing the number of sessions, involvement, and formation of members of staff, disposing of the necessary resources, and using technological tools.
DISCUSSION: The sheer variety of AHR interventions demonstrates that this is a fertile field in terms of intervention design and innovation. This work illustrates the importance of designing effective, adapted harm reduction interventions, prioritizing interventions that make support more accessible to more people. This also prompts us to consider the potential benefits of invoking proportionate universalism in the design of AHR interventions in order to operationalize alcohol harm reduction philosophy. accessible to more people. [Author's abstract]