Historique
Article de Périodique
Taxation reduces smoking but may not reduce smoking disparities in youth (2021)
Auteur(s) :
FLEISCHER, N. L. ;
DONAHOE, J. T. ;
MCLEOD, M. C. ;
THRASHER, J. F. ;
LEVY, D. T. ;
ELLIOTT, M. R. ;
MEZA, R. ;
PATRICK, M. E.
Année
2021
Page(s) :
264-272
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
60
Domaine :
Tabac / Tobacco / e-cigarette
Discipline :
EPI (Epidémiologie / Epidemiology)
Thésaurus géographique
ETATS-UNIS
Thésaurus mots-clés
ADOLESCENT
;
TABAC
;
ETUDE TRANSVERSALE
;
TAXE
;
PRIX
;
REDUCTION DE CONSOMMATION
;
CATEGORIE SOCIO-PROFESSIONNELLE
;
ETHNIE
;
SEXE
;
EFFICACITE
Autres mots-clés
Résumé :
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the extent to which cigarette taxes affect smoking behaviour and disparities in smoking among adolescents by gender, socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity.
METHODS: We used US nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional data from the 2005 to 2016 Monitoring the Future study to evaluate the relationship between state cigarette taxes and past 30-day current smoking, smoking intensity, and first cigarette and daily smoking initiation using modified Poisson and linear regression models, stratified by grade. We tested for interactions between tax and gender, SES and race/ethnicity on the additive scale using average marginal effects.
RESULTS: We found that higher taxes were associated with lower smoking outcomes, with variation by grade. Across nearly all of our specifications, there were no statistically significant interactions between tax and gender, SES or race/ethnicity for any grades/outcomes. One exception is that among 12th graders, there was a statistically significant interaction between tax and college plans, with taxes being associated with a lower probability of 30-day smoking among students who definitely planned to attend college compared with those who did not.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that higher taxes were associated with reduced smoking among adolescents, with little difference by gender, SES and racial/ethnicity groups. While effective at reducing adolescent smoking, taxes appear unlikely to reduce smoking disparities among youth.
METHODS: We used US nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional data from the 2005 to 2016 Monitoring the Future study to evaluate the relationship between state cigarette taxes and past 30-day current smoking, smoking intensity, and first cigarette and daily smoking initiation using modified Poisson and linear regression models, stratified by grade. We tested for interactions between tax and gender, SES and race/ethnicity on the additive scale using average marginal effects.
RESULTS: We found that higher taxes were associated with lower smoking outcomes, with variation by grade. Across nearly all of our specifications, there were no statistically significant interactions between tax and gender, SES or race/ethnicity for any grades/outcomes. One exception is that among 12th graders, there was a statistically significant interaction between tax and college plans, with taxes being associated with a lower probability of 30-day smoking among students who definitely planned to attend college compared with those who did not.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that higher taxes were associated with reduced smoking among adolescents, with little difference by gender, SES and racial/ethnicity groups. While effective at reducing adolescent smoking, taxes appear unlikely to reduce smoking disparities among youth.
Affiliation :
Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA