Article de Périodique
Medications for maintenance treatment of opioid use disorder in adolescents: A narrative review and assessment of clinical benefits and potential risks (2019)
Auteur(s) :
CAMENGA, D. R. ;
COLON-RIVERA, H. A. ;
MUVVALA, S. B.
Année
2019
Page(s) :
393-402
Sous-type de document :
Revue de la littérature / Literature review
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Domaine :
Autres substances / Other substances ; Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Thésaurus mots-clés
OPIOIDES
;
TRAITEMENT DE MAINTENANCE
;
ADOLESCENT
;
METHADONE
;
EFFICACITE
;
FACTEUR DE RISQUE
;
PHARMACOTHERAPIE
;
BUPRENORPHINE
;
NALTREXONE
;
HEROINE
;
MESUSAGE
Note générale :
- Medications for maintenance treatment of opioid use disorder in adolescents: A narrative review and assessment of clinical benefits and potential risks, offering a public health perspective - A commentary on Camenga et al. Gonzales-Castaneda R., Mooney L.J., Rawson R.A., p. 403-405.
- Do we know enough to prescribe opioid-agonist therapies to adolescents with problematic opioid use? A commentary on Camenga et al. (2019). Vest N., Humphreys K.N., p. 406-407.
- Do we know enough to prescribe opioid-agonist therapies to adolescents with problematic opioid use? A commentary on Camenga et al. (2019). Vest N., Humphreys K.N., p. 406-407.
Résumé :
Objective: Methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone are evidence-based treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). A large body of evidence supports their effectiveness in adults with OUD. However, few studies have tested their efficacy in adolescents. This study summarizes the clinical benefits and risks of three medications for the treatment of OUD in adolescents.
Method: We review and synthesize the published evidence about the efficacy and potential risks (including safety concerns) associated with methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone for the treatment of OUD in adolescents and compare their benefits and risks with that of no treatment or treatment without medications. We also discuss adolescent-specific treatment needs and strategies to overcome potential challenges in prescribing medications for adolescents with OUD.
Results: Methadone appears to be effective in promoting treatment retention among adolescents with heroin use disorder. Data from three randomized controlled trials suggest that buprenorphine treatment improves the likelihood of opioid abstinence and treatment retention. Although these medications have a potential risk of overdose when misused or used illegally, evidence suggests this risk is much lower for buprenorphine than methadone. Emerging data also suggest that naltrexone is a safe and feasible option for adolescents. Vast evidence demonstrates that the risks of untreated OUD far outweigh the risks of any of the previously discussed medications.
Conclusions: Little published evidence specifically examines the efficacy and safety of using medications for OUD in adolescents, and more research is needed. It is essential for healthcare professionals to determine whether their adolescent patients may benefit from medications for the treatment of OUD.
Method: We review and synthesize the published evidence about the efficacy and potential risks (including safety concerns) associated with methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone for the treatment of OUD in adolescents and compare their benefits and risks with that of no treatment or treatment without medications. We also discuss adolescent-specific treatment needs and strategies to overcome potential challenges in prescribing medications for adolescents with OUD.
Results: Methadone appears to be effective in promoting treatment retention among adolescents with heroin use disorder. Data from three randomized controlled trials suggest that buprenorphine treatment improves the likelihood of opioid abstinence and treatment retention. Although these medications have a potential risk of overdose when misused or used illegally, evidence suggests this risk is much lower for buprenorphine than methadone. Emerging data also suggest that naltrexone is a safe and feasible option for adolescents. Vast evidence demonstrates that the risks of untreated OUD far outweigh the risks of any of the previously discussed medications.
Conclusions: Little published evidence specifically examines the efficacy and safety of using medications for OUD in adolescents, and more research is needed. It is essential for healthcare professionals to determine whether their adolescent patients may benefit from medications for the treatment of OUD.
Affiliation :
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Cote :
Abonnement
Historique