Historique
Article de Périodique
SBIRT Implementation for adolescents in urban federally qualified health centers (2016)
Auteur(s) :
MITCHELL, S. G. ;
SCHWARTZ, R. P. ;
KIRK, A. S. ;
DUSEK, K. ;
OROS, M. ;
HOSLER, C. ;
GRYCZYNSKI, J. ;
BARBOSA, C. ;
DUNLAP, L. ;
LOUNSBURY, D. ;
O'GRADY, K. E. ;
BROWN, B. S.
Année
2016
Page(s) :
81-90
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Domaine :
Alcool / Alcohol ; Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs ; Tabac / Tobacco / e-cigarette
Thésaurus géographique
ETATS-UNIS
Thésaurus mots-clés
ADOLESCENT
;
INTERVENTION BREVE
;
ETUDE RANDOMISEE
;
DEPISTAGE
;
ORIENTATION
;
MODELE
Autres mots-clés
Résumé :
Background: Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use remains highly prevalent among US adolescents and is a threat to their well-being and to the public health. Evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses supports the effectiveness of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for adolescents with substance misuse but primary care providers have been slow to adopt this evidence-based approach. The purpose of this paper is to describe the theoretically informed methodology of an on-going implementation study.
Methods: This study protocol is a multi-site, cluster randomized trial (N = 7) guided by Proctor's conceptual model of implementation research and comparing two principal approaches to SBIRT delivery within adolescent medicine: Generalist vs. Specialist. In the Generalist Approach, the primary care provider delivers brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse. In the Specialist Approach, BIs are delivered by behavioral health counselors. The study will also examine the effectiveness of integrating HIV risk screening within an SBIRT model. Implementation Strategies employed include: integrated team development of the service delivery model, modifications to the electronic medical record, regular performance feedback and supervision. Implementation outcomes, include: Acceptability, Appropriateness, Adoption, Feasibility, Fidelity, Costs/Cost-Effectiveness, Penetration, and Sustainability.
Discussion: The study will fill a major gap in scientific knowledge regarding the best SBIRT implementation strategy at a time when SBIRT is poised to be brought to scale under health care reform. It will also provide novel data to inform the expansion of the SBIRT model to address HIV risk behaviors among adolescents. Finally, the study will generate important cost data that offer guidance to policymakers and clinic directors about the adoption of SBIRT in adolescent health care.
Highlights:
This on-going cluster randomized trial of Adolescent SBIRT is being implemented in 7 Federally Qualified Health Center clinics.
Proctor's Implementation outcomes are being examined.
Two different service delivery approaches are being compared: Generalist (BI provided by primary care physician) vs. Specialist (BI provided by a behavioral health counselor).
The integration of HIV discussions within the Brief Intervention is also being examined.
Methods: This study protocol is a multi-site, cluster randomized trial (N = 7) guided by Proctor's conceptual model of implementation research and comparing two principal approaches to SBIRT delivery within adolescent medicine: Generalist vs. Specialist. In the Generalist Approach, the primary care provider delivers brief intervention (BI) for substance misuse. In the Specialist Approach, BIs are delivered by behavioral health counselors. The study will also examine the effectiveness of integrating HIV risk screening within an SBIRT model. Implementation Strategies employed include: integrated team development of the service delivery model, modifications to the electronic medical record, regular performance feedback and supervision. Implementation outcomes, include: Acceptability, Appropriateness, Adoption, Feasibility, Fidelity, Costs/Cost-Effectiveness, Penetration, and Sustainability.
Discussion: The study will fill a major gap in scientific knowledge regarding the best SBIRT implementation strategy at a time when SBIRT is poised to be brought to scale under health care reform. It will also provide novel data to inform the expansion of the SBIRT model to address HIV risk behaviors among adolescents. Finally, the study will generate important cost data that offer guidance to policymakers and clinic directors about the adoption of SBIRT in adolescent health care.
Highlights:
This on-going cluster randomized trial of Adolescent SBIRT is being implemented in 7 Federally Qualified Health Center clinics.
Proctor's Implementation outcomes are being examined.
Two different service delivery approaches are being compared: Generalist (BI provided by primary care physician) vs. Specialist (BI provided by a behavioral health counselor).
The integration of HIV discussions within the Brief Intervention is also being examined.
Affiliation :
Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD USA