Article de Périodique
Patterns of change in implementation of state alcohol control policies in the United States, 1999-2011 (2015)
Auteur(s) :
NELSON, T. F. ;
XUAN, Z. ;
BLANCHETTE, J. G. ;
HEEREN, T. C. ;
NAIMI, T. S.
Année
2015
Page(s) :
59-68
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
42
Domaine :
Alcool / Alcohol
Discipline :
SAN (Santé publique / Public health)
Thésaurus géographique
ETATS-UNIS
Thésaurus mots-clés
ALCOOL
;
POLITIQUE
;
LEGISLATION
;
SANTE PUBLIQUE
;
EFFICACITE
;
ETUDE LONGITUDINALE
;
CONDUITE DE VEHICULE
;
EVOLUTION
;
POPULATION GENERALE
;
AGE MINIMUM LEGAL
Note générale :
Commentary: Challenges of adopting and implementing effective alcohol policies. Giesbrecht N., p. 69-70.
Résumé :
Aims: To examine state alcohol control policy implementation by policy efficacy and intent.
Design: A descriptive longitudinal analysis of policy implementation. Setting The United States, 1999-2011.
Participants: Fifty states and the District of Columbia. Measurements Twenty-nine state-level policies were rated based on an implementation rating (IR; range = 0.0-1.0) gathered from the Alcohol Policy Information System, government and industry reports and other sources; and expert judgment about policy efficacy for addressing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving among the general population and youth, respectively.
Findings: On average, implementation of the most effective general population policies did not change [mean IR = 0.366 in 1999; 0.375 in 2011; slope for annual change = 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) for the slope -0.001, 0.002]. In contrast, implementation increased over time for less effective policies (mean IR = 0.287 in 1999; 0.427 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.009; slope 95% CI = 0.002-0.007), for youth-oriented policies (mean IR = 0.424 in 1999; 0.511 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.007; slope 95% CI = 0.005-0.009), and for impaired driving policies (mean IR = 0.493 in 1999; 0.608 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.0105; slope 95% CI = 0.007-0.014).
Conclusions: Implementation of politically palatable state alcohol policies, such as those targeting youth and alcohol-impaired driving, and less effective policies increased during 1999-2011 in the United States, while the most effective policies that may maximally protect public health remained underused.
Design: A descriptive longitudinal analysis of policy implementation. Setting The United States, 1999-2011.
Participants: Fifty states and the District of Columbia. Measurements Twenty-nine state-level policies were rated based on an implementation rating (IR; range = 0.0-1.0) gathered from the Alcohol Policy Information System, government and industry reports and other sources; and expert judgment about policy efficacy for addressing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving among the general population and youth, respectively.
Findings: On average, implementation of the most effective general population policies did not change [mean IR = 0.366 in 1999; 0.375 in 2011; slope for annual change = 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) for the slope -0.001, 0.002]. In contrast, implementation increased over time for less effective policies (mean IR = 0.287 in 1999; 0.427 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.009; slope 95% CI = 0.002-0.007), for youth-oriented policies (mean IR = 0.424 in 1999; 0.511 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.007; slope 95% CI = 0.005-0.009), and for impaired driving policies (mean IR = 0.493 in 1999; 0.608 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.0105; slope 95% CI = 0.007-0.014).
Conclusions: Implementation of politically palatable state alcohol policies, such as those targeting youth and alcohol-impaired driving, and less effective policies increased during 1999-2011 in the United States, while the most effective policies that may maximally protect public health remained underused.
Affiliation :
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Cote :
Abonnement
Historique