Article de Périodique
Failures in substance use surveys (2012)
Auteur(s) :
JOHNSON, T. P. (Auteur) ;
SAFIKA, I. (Auteur du commentaire) ;
VANGEEST, J. B. (Auteur du commentaire)
Année
2012
Page(s) :
1675-1682
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Domaine :
Plusieurs produits / Several products
Discipline :
EPI (Epidémiologie / Epidemiology)
Note générale :
Commentaries:
- Safika I., p. 1683-1684.
- Addressing "failures in substance use surveys" through applications of best practices. Vangeest J.B., p. 1685-1686.
Commentary: Promoting the use of substance use survey data, Cho Y.I. Substance Use and Misuse, 2014;49(6): p. 775-776.
- Safika I., p. 1683-1684.
- Addressing "failures in substance use surveys" through applications of best practices. Vangeest J.B., p. 1685-1686.
Commentary: Promoting the use of substance use survey data, Cho Y.I. Substance Use and Misuse, 2014;49(6): p. 775-776.
Résumé :
This paper reviews some of the potential sources of failure in surveys concerned with substance use. These failures are both conceptual and methodological in nature. Conceptual failures include nonuse and misuse of survey data, the inability of these data to detect emerging substance use trends and problems, and relevant ethical concerns. Methodological failures include sampling, coverage, nonresponse, and measurement and processing errors, which are indigenous at some level to all epidemiologic surveys. Consideration of these is necessary if survey data are to be appropriately used for their intended purposes.
Affiliation :
Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Cote :
Abonnement
Historique