Article de Périodique
Meta-analysis of day treatment and contingency-management dismantling research: Birmingham Homeless Cocaine Studies (1990-2006) (2007)
(Méta-analyse d'une recherche démantelant le soin de jour et la procédure de renforcement : enquêtes sur la cocaïne des sans-abris de Birmingham (1990-2006)
Auteur(s) :
SCHUMACHER, J. E. ;
MILBY, J. B. ;
WALLACE, D. ;
MEEHAN, D. C. ;
KERTESZ, S. ;
VUCHINICH, R. ;
DUNNING J. ;
USDAN, S.
Année
2007
Page(s) :
823-828
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
18
Domaine :
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Thésaurus mots-clés
COCAINE
;
SANS ABRI
;
RECHERCHE
;
PRISE EN CHARGE
;
ABSTINENCE
;
ENQUETE
;
EVALUATION
Note générale :
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2007, 75, (5), 823-828
Note de contenu :
fig. ; tabl.
Résumé :
ENGLISH :
Four successive randomized clinical trials studying contingency management (CM), involving various treatment arms of drug-abstinent housing and work therapy and day treatment (DT) with a behavioral component, were compared on common drug abstinence outcomes at 2 treatment completion points (2 and 6 months). The clinical trials were conducted from 1990 to 2006 in Birmingham, Alabama, with a total of 644 homeless persons with primary crack cocaine addiction. The meta-analysis utilized the weighted least squares approach to integrate data encompassing 9 different treatment arms to assess the effects of CM and DT (neither, DT only, CM only, and CM = DT) on a common estimate of prevalence of drug abstinence. Taken together, the results show much stronger benefits from CM = DT and from CM only than for DT alone. Throughout all of the Birmingham Homeless Cocaine Studies, the CM = DT consistently produced higher abstinence prevalence than did no CM. (Author' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Etats-Unis. United States.
Cote :
Abonnement
Historique