Périodique
Assessment of abuse liability of stimulant drugs in humans : a methodological survey
(Evaluation du potentiel addictif des stimulants chez l'homme : étude méthodologique)
Auteur(s) :
FOLTIN, R. W. ;
FISCHMAN, M. W.
Année
1991
Langue(s) :
Anglais
ISBN :
0376-8716
Refs biblio. :
200
Domaine :
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Discipline :
PRO (Produits, mode d'action, méthode de dépistage / Substances, action mode, screening methods)
Thésaurus mots-clés
CAFEINE
;
COCAINE
;
AMPHETAMINE
;
ANOREXIGENES
;
ABUS
;
EVALUATION
;
POTENTIEL ADDICTIF
;
TOXICITE
;
METHODE
Note générale :
Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1991, 28, 3-48
Résumé :
FRANÇAIS :
Les stimulants sont consommés illicitement depuis des siècles. Durant les dernières décades, des études ont été réalisées afin de limiter l'introduction sur le marché de nouveaux stimulants à haut pouvoir toxicomanogène. Les amphétamines et la cocaïne peuvent être considérées comme des prototypes à haut pouvoir addictif. La méthodologie est classique : mesure des effets subjectifs, méthode discriminatoire, auto-administration... L'article détaille les effets comportementaux d'un certain nombre de drogues : phenmétrazine, diéthylpropion, mazindol, méthylphénidate, fenfluramine, phénypropanolamine. La meilleure évaluation simple est donnée par les méthodes d'auto-administration mais une évaluation multidimensionnelle est plus précise.
ENGLISH :
Stimulants drugs have been illicitly consumed for non-medical purposes for centuries. Within the past several decades procedures for assessing the abuse liability of a compound prior to marketing have been developed, which should limit the introduction of new stimulants with high abuse liability to the public. Drugs with high abuse liability are positive reinforcers in that they maintain behavior leading to their consumption. Assessment of abuse liability has traditionally involved a comparison of the profile of effects of a known drug of abuse to that of a drug with unknown abuse liability. In this paper the behavioral effects of a number of stimulant drugs will be compared along these dimensions and the effects along each dimension will be related to each drugs' known abuse liability. Dissociations among the various measures will also be described, and the implications of these dissociations discussed. We conclude that the best single assessment of abuse liability is obtained from drug self-administration studies, but that the most accurate assessment of abuse liability is obtained when the effects of a drug are evaluated along as many of these dimensions as possible.(Extract from the author's abstract)
Les stimulants sont consommés illicitement depuis des siècles. Durant les dernières décades, des études ont été réalisées afin de limiter l'introduction sur le marché de nouveaux stimulants à haut pouvoir toxicomanogène. Les amphétamines et la cocaïne peuvent être considérées comme des prototypes à haut pouvoir addictif. La méthodologie est classique : mesure des effets subjectifs, méthode discriminatoire, auto-administration... L'article détaille les effets comportementaux d'un certain nombre de drogues : phenmétrazine, diéthylpropion, mazindol, méthylphénidate, fenfluramine, phénypropanolamine. La meilleure évaluation simple est donnée par les méthodes d'auto-administration mais une évaluation multidimensionnelle est plus précise.
ENGLISH :
Stimulants drugs have been illicitly consumed for non-medical purposes for centuries. Within the past several decades procedures for assessing the abuse liability of a compound prior to marketing have been developed, which should limit the introduction of new stimulants with high abuse liability to the public. Drugs with high abuse liability are positive reinforcers in that they maintain behavior leading to their consumption. Assessment of abuse liability has traditionally involved a comparison of the profile of effects of a known drug of abuse to that of a drug with unknown abuse liability. In this paper the behavioral effects of a number of stimulant drugs will be compared along these dimensions and the effects along each dimension will be related to each drugs' known abuse liability. Dissociations among the various measures will also be described, and the implications of these dissociations discussed. We conclude that the best single assessment of abuse liability is obtained from drug self-administration studies, but that the most accurate assessment of abuse liability is obtained when the effects of a drug are evaluated along as many of these dimensions as possible.(Extract from the author's abstract)
Affiliation :
Div. Behav. Biol., Dept Psychiat. Behav. Sci, J. Hopkins Univ. Sch. Med., 600 N Wolfe st, Houck E-2, Baltimore, MD 21205
Etats-Unis. United States.
Etats-Unis. United States.
Historique