Is recovery planning any different from treatment planning?

FRANÇAIS :
Cet article compare le processus du planning de "guérison" des programmes de modèle social et le processus du planning de "traitement" de programme de modèle médical : mise en oeuvre, conduite et évaluation du programme, rôle du personnel face aux patients. Tandis que le personnel professionnel du modèle médical dirige et contrôle le programme et sa mise en place, les patients du modèle social sont actifs et responsables de leur propre guérison, et de sa gestion, sous la surveillance d'un personnel de pairs, anciens dépendants. Les répercussions de ce rôle passif ou actif du patient, durant le traitement, sur sa conduite durant la post-cure devraient également être étudiées pour examiner si des différences apparaissent entre les deux modèles après la cure.
ENGLISH :
This paper compares the "recovery" planning process of the social model programs with the "treatment" planning process in a comparison medical model program : how the planning process is conducted, the role of staff versus clients in the planning process, how the implementation of the planning process is monitored and evaluated at the programs. Professional staff at medical model programs generally direct and control the planning process and its implementation. In social model programs, clients are directly responsible for developing their own recovery plans, within a context of help from peers and recovering staff (who oversee the process). Treatment planning and recovery planning are distinct and defining features of medical and social model philosophies. Treatment planning in medical model programs and recovery planning in social model programs serve similar administrative and programmatic functions. However, the impact on patients/residents is likely to be significantly different. Recovery planning becomes a skill acquired by clients. (From author's abstract)