Périodique
Hair testing for "ecstasy" (MDMA) in volunteer Scottish drug users
(Dépistage dans les cheveux de l'ecstasy (MDMA) chez des usagers de drogues volontaires en Ecosse.)
Auteur(s) :
DITTON, J. ;
COOPER, G. A. ;
SCOTT, K. S. ;
ALLEN, D. L. ;
OLIVER, J. S. ;
SMITH, I. D.
Année
2000
Page(s) :
207-213
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
30
Domaine :
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Note générale :
Addiction Biology, 2000, 5, (2), 207-213
Note de contenu :
tabl.
Résumé :
FRANÇAIS :
L'objectif de l'étude est de comparer les déclarations par interview d'usage d'ecstasy et les résultats d'analyse des cheveux chez 100 sujets. La concordance entre les deux investigations ne dépasse pas 59%. Pour les 52 cas concordant, la dispersion des résultats ne donne pas de corrélation significative. Le dépistage dans les cheveux de la MDMA n'atteint pas une précision suffisante qui permettrait son utilisation en population générale. Cependant le dépistage dans les cheveux est probablement plus fiable que les déclarations faites par les usagers.
ENGLISH :
The aim of the study was to compare self reported "ecstasy" use with the results of the analysis of hair harvested from the same users. Subjects were recruited by multisite chain-referral sampling within the 1994-95 "dance scene" in Glasgow. One hundred subjects donated hair after completing a lengthy interviewer-administered questionnaire. Overall gross concordance between self reported "ecstasy" use and discovery of MDMA (or related compounds) in analysed hair did not surpass 59%, and no relationship had a Cohen's kappa of more than 0.08. Within the positive concordant dataset (n = 52), scatter was considerable, with no correlation being significant, and none more strongly positive than -0.0-518. The results presented here indicate that, as far as MDMA is concerned, if judged by self-report, hair does not reach a level of apparent accuracy that would permit its use as a general population estimator. However, hair testing is probably more reliable than self-report, and its accuracy could be verified independently if large-scale inter- and intra-laboratory comparative research is conducted. (Author' s abstract)
L'objectif de l'étude est de comparer les déclarations par interview d'usage d'ecstasy et les résultats d'analyse des cheveux chez 100 sujets. La concordance entre les deux investigations ne dépasse pas 59%. Pour les 52 cas concordant, la dispersion des résultats ne donne pas de corrélation significative. Le dépistage dans les cheveux de la MDMA n'atteint pas une précision suffisante qui permettrait son utilisation en population générale. Cependant le dépistage dans les cheveux est probablement plus fiable que les déclarations faites par les usagers.
ENGLISH :
The aim of the study was to compare self reported "ecstasy" use with the results of the analysis of hair harvested from the same users. Subjects were recruited by multisite chain-referral sampling within the 1994-95 "dance scene" in Glasgow. One hundred subjects donated hair after completing a lengthy interviewer-administered questionnaire. Overall gross concordance between self reported "ecstasy" use and discovery of MDMA (or related compounds) in analysed hair did not surpass 59%, and no relationship had a Cohen's kappa of more than 0.08. Within the positive concordant dataset (n = 52), scatter was considerable, with no correlation being significant, and none more strongly positive than -0.0-518. The results presented here indicate that, as far as MDMA is concerned, if judged by self-report, hair does not reach a level of apparent accuracy that would permit its use as a general population estimator. However, hair testing is probably more reliable than self-report, and its accuracy could be verified independently if large-scale inter- and intra-laboratory comparative research is conducted. (Author' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Scottish Centre Criminology, First Floor, 19 Kelvinside Gardens East, Glasgow G20 6BE, jasonditton@lineone.net.com
Royaume-Uni. United Kingdom.
Royaume-Uni. United Kingdom.
Historique