Historique
FRANÇAIS :
Analyse des résultats d'une centaine de programmes de prévention destinés aux adolescents et discussion autour des stratégies qui paraissent conduire à un succès.
ENGLISH :
This paper reports findings of a subset of 91 programs[...]
Auteur N. S. TOBLER
6 Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
N. S. TOBLER ; H. H. STRATTON | 1997
Dans Journal of Primary Prevention (Vol.18, n°1, September 1997) Article : PériodiqueEffectiveness of different types of drug prevention programs was examined in a meta-analysis of 120 school-based programs (5th-12th) that evaluated success on self-reported drug use measures. Hypothesis tests using Weighted Least Squares regress[...]
N. S. TOBLER | 2000
Dans Journal of Primary Prevention (Vol.20, n°4, June 2000) Article : PériodiqueIngredients of adolescent school-based drug prevention programs needed to reduce, prevent or delay adolescent substance abuse are presented in the historical context of three meta-analyses. Non-interactive programs showed only a 4% reduction in [...]
Presented is a meta-analysis of the outcome results for 143 adolescent drug prevention programs to identify the most effective program modalities for reducing teenage drug use. Glass' et al. (1981) meta-analysis techniques provided a systematic [...]
D. R. BLACK ; N. S. TOBLER ; SCIACCA J.P. | 1998
Dans Journal of School Health (Vol.68, n°3, March 1998) Article : PériodiquePeer-led drug prevention programs for middle school youth are reviewed as to whether or not they are a vital resource in an overall effort to minimize the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs (ATOD). The paper focuses on the following: a) re[...]
N. S. TOBLER ; M. R. ROONA ; P. OCHSHORN ; D. G. MARSHALL ; A. V. STREKE ; K. M. STACKPOLE | 2000
Dans Journal of Primary Prevention (Vol.20, n°4, June 2000) Article : PériodiqueThis paper reports on a meta-analysis of 207 universal school-based drug prevention programs that compared the self-reported drug use of treatment to control or comparison youth. Programs are classified into Interactive and Non-Interactive group[...]
