Historique
Périodique
Incorporating a public health approach in drug law : lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36
(Introduire une approche de santé publique dans les lois sur les drogues : apport du développement local de la capacité et de l'accès aux soins selon la proposition 36 de l'Etat de Californie)
Auteur(s) :
KLEIN, D. ;
MILLER, R. E. ;
NOBLE, A. ;
SPEIGLMAN R.
Année
2004
Page(s) :
723-757
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
84
Domaine :
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Discipline :
LOI (Loi et son application / Law enforcement)
Thésaurus mots-clés
LEGISLATION
;
TRAITEMENT
;
ABUS
;
POLITIQUE
;
PRODUIT ILLICITE
;
OBLIGATION DE SOINS
;
ACCES AUX SOINS
Thésaurus géographique
ETATS-UNIS
Note générale :
Milbank Quarterly, 2004, 82, (4), 723-757
Résumé :
FRANÇAIS :
Une initiative majeure de l'Etat de Californie, la proposition 36 prévoit que les adultes reconnus coupables de possession de drogues peuvent se voir proposer un traitement à la place de l'incarcération. L'article montre comment les contés ont augmenté leur capacité d'accueil en traitement et géré l'accès à ces traitements.
ENGLISH :
A major state drug abuse initiative, California's Proposition 36 of 2000, mandated that adults convicted of drug possession be offered treatment in lieu of incarceration. While the law expanded public treatment for arrestees, the counties were given discretion in structuring their systems of care and procedures to manage clients. Using data from a study of key informants in eight counties, this article examines local planning to increase drug treatment capacity and manage clients'access to treatment. In both these planning domains, it describes the counties' strategies and concerns, reasons for their differences in approaches, and whether and how this state initiative, which explicitly incorporated treatment objectives into penal drug law, will shift the debate over drug abuse policy toward greater consideration of public health goals. (Review' s abstract)
Une initiative majeure de l'Etat de Californie, la proposition 36 prévoit que les adultes reconnus coupables de possession de drogues peuvent se voir proposer un traitement à la place de l'incarcération. L'article montre comment les contés ont augmenté leur capacité d'accueil en traitement et géré l'accès à ces traitements.
ENGLISH :
A major state drug abuse initiative, California's Proposition 36 of 2000, mandated that adults convicted of drug possession be offered treatment in lieu of incarceration. While the law expanded public treatment for arrestees, the counties were given discretion in structuring their systems of care and procedures to manage clients. Using data from a study of key informants in eight counties, this article examines local planning to increase drug treatment capacity and manage clients'access to treatment. In both these planning domains, it describes the counties' strategies and concerns, reasons for their differences in approaches, and whether and how this state initiative, which explicitly incorporated treatment objectives into penal drug law, will shift the debate over drug abuse policy toward greater consideration of public health goals. (Review' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Publ. Hlth Inst., 555 12th St., Oakland, CA 94607 : doriek@phi.org
Etats-Unis. United States.
Etats-Unis. United States.