Périodique
Efficacy and safety of naltrexone and acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence : a systematic review
(Efficacité et sécurite de la naltrexone et de l'acamprosate dans le traitement de la dépendance à l'alcool : une revue systématique de la littérature.)
Auteur(s) :
BOUZA C. ;
MAGRO A. ;
MUNOZ, A. ;
AMATE, J. M.
Année
2004
Page(s) :
811-828
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
75
Domaine :
Alcool / Alcohol
Note générale :
Addiction, 2004, 99, (7), 811-828
Note de contenu :
graph. ; tabl.
Résumé :
FRANÇAIS :
Une revue des études publiées de 1990 à 2002 sur lévaluation du traitement de lalcoolisme par lacamprosate et la naltrexone montre que les deux produits sont efficaces en tant que traitement adjuvant. Lacamprosate semble plus particulièrement utile dans les approches thérapeutiques visant labstinence, alors que la naltrexone semble plus indiquée dans les programmes de contrôle de la consommation. Les produits présentent une tolérance acceptable.
ENGLISH :
Aims: To ascertain the efficacy and safety of naltrexone and acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Methods: Systematic review of the literature (1990-2002) and meta-analysis of full published randomized and controlled clinical trials assessing acamprosate or naltrexone therapy in alcohol dependence. Estimates of effect were calculated according to the fixed-effects model. Measurements: Relapse and abstinence rates, cumulative abstinence duration and treatment compliance were considered as primary outcomes. Findings: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Acamprosate was associated with a significant improvement in abstinence rate [odds ratio (OR): 1.88 (1.57, 2.25), P < 0.001] and days of cumulative abstinence [WMD: 26.55 (17.56, 36.54]. Short-term administration of naltrexone reduced the relapse rate significantly [OR: 0.62 (0.52, 0.75). P < 0.001], but was not associated with a significant modification in the abstinence rate [OR: 1.26 (0.97,1.64), P = 0.08]. There were insufficient data to ascertain naltrexone's efficacy over more prolonged periods. Acamprosate had a good safety pattern and was associated with a significant improvement in treatment compliance [OR: 1.29 (1.13,1.47), P < 0.001]. Naltrexone's side effects were more numerous, yet the drug was nevertheless tolerated acceptably without being associated with a lower adherence to treatment (OR: 0.94 (0.80, 1.1), P = 0.5). However, overall compliance was relatively low with both medications. Conclusions: Both acamprosate and naltrexone are effective as adjuvant therapies for alcohol dependence in adults. Acamprosate appears to be especially useful in a therapeutic approach targeted at achieving abstinence, whereas naltrexone seems more indicated in programmes geared to controlled consumption. Both drugs are safe and acceptably tolerated but issues of compliance need to be addressed adequately to assure their usefulness in clinical practice. (Author' s abstract)
Une revue des études publiées de 1990 à 2002 sur lévaluation du traitement de lalcoolisme par lacamprosate et la naltrexone montre que les deux produits sont efficaces en tant que traitement adjuvant. Lacamprosate semble plus particulièrement utile dans les approches thérapeutiques visant labstinence, alors que la naltrexone semble plus indiquée dans les programmes de contrôle de la consommation. Les produits présentent une tolérance acceptable.
ENGLISH :
Aims: To ascertain the efficacy and safety of naltrexone and acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Methods: Systematic review of the literature (1990-2002) and meta-analysis of full published randomized and controlled clinical trials assessing acamprosate or naltrexone therapy in alcohol dependence. Estimates of effect were calculated according to the fixed-effects model. Measurements: Relapse and abstinence rates, cumulative abstinence duration and treatment compliance were considered as primary outcomes. Findings: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Acamprosate was associated with a significant improvement in abstinence rate [odds ratio (OR): 1.88 (1.57, 2.25), P < 0.001] and days of cumulative abstinence [WMD: 26.55 (17.56, 36.54]. Short-term administration of naltrexone reduced the relapse rate significantly [OR: 0.62 (0.52, 0.75). P < 0.001], but was not associated with a significant modification in the abstinence rate [OR: 1.26 (0.97,1.64), P = 0.08]. There were insufficient data to ascertain naltrexone's efficacy over more prolonged periods. Acamprosate had a good safety pattern and was associated with a significant improvement in treatment compliance [OR: 1.29 (1.13,1.47), P < 0.001]. Naltrexone's side effects were more numerous, yet the drug was nevertheless tolerated acceptably without being associated with a lower adherence to treatment (OR: 0.94 (0.80, 1.1), P = 0.5). However, overall compliance was relatively low with both medications. Conclusions: Both acamprosate and naltrexone are effective as adjuvant therapies for alcohol dependence in adults. Acamprosate appears to be especially useful in a therapeutic approach targeted at achieving abstinence, whereas naltrexone seems more indicated in programmes geared to controlled consumption. Both drugs are safe and acceptably tolerated but issues of compliance need to be addressed adequately to assure their usefulness in clinical practice. (Author' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Insituto de Salud Carlos III, Sinesio Delgado 4, 28029 Madrid
Espagne. Spain.
Espagne. Spain.
Historique