Périodique
The rise of buprenorphine prescribing in England: analysis of NHS regional data, 2001-2003
(La montée de la prescription de buprénorphine en Angleterre : analyse des données régionales 2001-2003 du NHS - National Health Service.)
Auteur(s) :
DE WET, C. J. ;
REED, L. J. ;
BEARN, J.
Année
2005
Page(s) :
495-499
Langue(s) :
Anglais
Refs biblio. :
9
Domaine :
Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs
Thésaurus mots-clés
PRESCRIPTION MEDICALE
;
METHADONE
;
BUPRENORPHINE
;
PREVALENCE
;
COMPARAISON
Thésaurus géographique
ANGLETERRE
Note générale :
Addiction, 2005, 100, (4), 495-499, fig. ; tabl.
Résumé :
FRANÇAIS :
Le taux de prescription de la buprénorphine (par rapport à toutes les prescriptions d'opiacés) a augmenté de façon disproportionnée par rapport à celui de la méthadone. Le nombre de prescription a augmenté de 23% et représente 45% du coût des prescriptions d'opiacés en Angleterre.
ENGLISH:
Aims Since its launch in the prescribing market in 1999 for the treatment of opiate dependence, buprenorphine has rapidly become established as an alternative to methadone treatment in the United Kingdom. In the absence of evidence of its clinical superiority over methadone, and given its high relative cost, we sought to examine the impact of buprenorphine availability on opiate treatment services in England. Methods Quarterly buprenorphine and methadone community prescription figures were obtained for 28 Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) in England, for the 2-year period September 2001 to September 2003. Rates of buprenorphine prescribing (as proportion of all opiate prescriptions) were examined over time by number of prescriptions and net ingredient cost. Results Buprenorphine prescription rates increased disproportionately to methadone in all 28 SHAs. By the end of 2003 the number of buprenorphine prescriptions had increased to 23% of all opiate prescriptions, but accounted for 45% of opiate prescription costs in England. Buprenorphine prescribing rates varied substantially across different regions. Conclusions Buprenorphine prescribing has increased dramatically and represents a disproportionately large fraction of community opiate prescribing costs. The marked regional variation suggests the need for further research and the development of national guidelines to support rational prescribing and equitable access to treatment. (Author' s abstract)
Le taux de prescription de la buprénorphine (par rapport à toutes les prescriptions d'opiacés) a augmenté de façon disproportionnée par rapport à celui de la méthadone. Le nombre de prescription a augmenté de 23% et représente 45% du coût des prescriptions d'opiacés en Angleterre.
ENGLISH:
Aims Since its launch in the prescribing market in 1999 for the treatment of opiate dependence, buprenorphine has rapidly become established as an alternative to methadone treatment in the United Kingdom. In the absence of evidence of its clinical superiority over methadone, and given its high relative cost, we sought to examine the impact of buprenorphine availability on opiate treatment services in England. Methods Quarterly buprenorphine and methadone community prescription figures were obtained for 28 Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) in England, for the 2-year period September 2001 to September 2003. Rates of buprenorphine prescribing (as proportion of all opiate prescriptions) were examined over time by number of prescriptions and net ingredient cost. Results Buprenorphine prescription rates increased disproportionately to methadone in all 28 SHAs. By the end of 2003 the number of buprenorphine prescriptions had increased to 23% of all opiate prescriptions, but accounted for 45% of opiate prescription costs in England. Buprenorphine prescribing rates varied substantially across different regions. Conclusions Buprenorphine prescribing has increased dramatically and represents a disproportionately large fraction of community opiate prescribing costs. The marked regional variation suggests the need for further research and the development of national guidelines to support rational prescribing and equitable access to treatment. (Author' s abstract)
Affiliation :
Wickham Park House, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX,
Royaume-Uni. United Kingdom.
Royaume-Uni. United Kingdom.
Historique