Titre : | Injecting drug use in Brighton, Liverpool and London: best estimates of prevalence and coverage of public health indicators (2004) |
Titre traduit : | (Injection de drogues à Brighton, Liverpool et Londres : meilleure estimation de la prévalence et de la couverture des indicateurs de santé publique) |
Auteurs : | M. HICKMAN ; HIGGINS V. ; V. HOPE ; M. A. BELLIS ; K. TILLING ; A. WALKER ; J. HENRY |
Type de document : | Article : Périodique |
Dans : | Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (Vol.58, n°9, September 2004) |
Article en page(s) : | 766-771 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Discipline : | EPI (Epidémiologie / Epidemiology) |
Mots-clés : |
Thésaurus mots-clés INJECTION ; INDICATEUR ; USAGER ; VOIE INTRAVEINEUSE ; PREVALENCE ; SANTE PUBLIQUE ; METHODE ; EPIDEMIOLOGIE DESCRIPTIVE ; ENQUETEThésaurus géographique ROYAUME-UNI |
Résumé : | Study objective: To estimate the prevalence of injecting drug use (IDU) in three cities in England and to measure the coverage of key public health indicators. Design: Capture-recapture techniques with covariate effects. Setting: Liverpool, Brighton, and 12 London boroughs, 2000/01. Participants: IDU collated and matched across five data sources -community recruited survey, specialist drug treatment, arrest referral, syringe exchange, and accident and emergency- 896 in Brighton, 1224 in Liverpool, and 6111 in London. Main results: It is estimated that in 2000/01 the number and prevalence of IDU aged 15-44 was 2300 (95%Cl 1500 to 3700) and 2.0% (95%Cl% 1.3% to 3.2%) in Brighton; 2900 (95%Cl 2500 to 5000) and 1.5% (95%Cl 1.3% to 2.6%) in Liverpool; 16 700 (95%Cl 13 800 to 21 600) and 1.2% (95%Cl 1.0% to 1.6%) in 12 London boroughs; with a prevalence of 1.7% (95%Cl 1.2% to 3.3%) in inner London. It is estimated that: less than one in four IDU are in treatment in the three areas; syringe exchange programmes covered about 25% of injections in Brighton and Liverpool and 20% in London; and that the annual opioid mortality rate among IDU was 2% in Brighton compared with less than 1% in Liverpool and London. Conclusions: Credible estimates of the prevalence of injecting drug use (and key public health indicators) can be determined using covariate capture-recapture techniques. These suggest that: targets to double the number in treatment are possible: syringe distribution should be increased; and further attention, especially in Brighton, given to reducing overdose mortality. |
Domaine : | Drogues illicites / Illicit drugs |
Refs biblio. : | 43 |
Affiliation : | CRDHB, Social Science and Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK |
Numéro Toxibase : | 1300985 |
Centre Emetteur : | 13 OFDT |
Lien : | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.015164 |
Accueil